What is Imre Lakatos known for?
Imre Lakatos ( UK: / ˈlækətɒs /, US: /- toʊs /; Hungarian: Lakatos Imre [ˈlɒkɒtoʃ ˈimrɛ]; November 9, 1922 – February 2, 1974) was a Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science, known for his thesis of the fallibility of mathematics and its ‘methodology of proofs and refutations’ in its pre-axiomatic stages of development,
Where can I find Imre Lakatos’s papers?
Imre Lakatos’s papers are held at the London School of Economics. His personal library at the Wayback Machine (archived January 5, 2008) is also held at the School.
What did Lakatos contribution to the philosophy of Science?
Research programmes. Lakatos’s second major contribution to the philosophy of science was his model of the ‘research programme’, which he formulated in an attempt to resolve the perceived conflict between Popper’s falsificationism and the revolutionary structure of science described by Kuhn.
What did Lakatos mean by no final theorem of informal mathematics?
What Lakatos tried to establish was that no theorem of informal mathematics is final or perfect. This means that we should not think that a theorem is ultimately true, only that no counterexample has yet been found. Once a counterexample is found, we adjust the theorem, possibly extending the domain of its validity.
Is Lakatos an inductivist?
However the inductivism that Lakatos scornfully rejects in Renaissance is just the kind of inductivism that he would be recommending to Popper just a few years later. In 1964 Lakatos turned from the history and philosophy of mathematics to the history and philosophy of the empirical sciences.
How does Lakatos use history in proofs and refutations?
At one point in Proofs and Refutations a character in the dialogue makes a historical claim which, according to the relevant footnote, is false. Lakatos says that the statement although heuristically correct ( i.e. true in a rational history of mathematics) is historically false.