What was found by Talarico and Rubin 2003 in their comparison of flashbulb and everyday memories?
Talarico and Rubin suggested that flashbulb memories and ordinary autobiographical memories differ not in their rate of forgetting, but in the confidence with which they are held, with confidence in flashbulb memories remaining high, even as the memories are forgotten.
Do other countries learn about 9 11?
Spanish, French and Russian textbooks discuss Sept. 11 alongside terrorist attacks that struck their own citizens. But some countries teach students that the events of that day offer a lesson, or perhaps a warning, for the world’s powers.
Why is the original study by Brown and Kulik rather problematic in its conclusion that surprise played a key role in the creation of flashbulb memories?
They concluded that flashbulb memories were not necessarily as accurate as Brown and Kulik suggested. The problem is that accuracy cannot be controlled with self-report procedures, so Brown and Kulik’s findings are arguably the result of faulty methods rather than flashbulb memories.
Which is the most accurate statement about flashbulb memories?
Which of these is an ACCURATE statement about flashbulb memories? People perceive these memories as more vivid and accurate than their ordinary memories.
What was the aim of Brown and Kulik?
Aim: Brown & Kulik proposed that some events can be remembered as though our mind had photographed them – what they called flashbulb memories. They argued that these memories were caused when the event not only was surprising, but was of personal relevance to the life of the individual.
Can you get PTSD from 911?
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are the most common health effect of the 9/11 attacks. Up to 20% of adults directly exposed to the disaster or injured in the attack had PTSD symptoms five to six years after the attack; this is four times the rate in the general population.